Proof before pitch.
Pyrskene builds fire protection for homes at wildfire’s last mile. Before we raise for a proof-of-concept, we show the design to outside experts first – Engineers, scientists, and underwriters – the people who must trust it.
Why now
Three forces are hitting at once. Insurers are leaving high-risk areas fast. States are turning fire rules into law. And the Wildland-Urban Interface keeps growing each year. These forces won’t reverse. They’re pushing a market that left this problem to homeowners toward a real fix.
The gap
Fire scientists have known how homes ignite for 30 years. Most homes burn from windblown embers, not the fire itself. Good standards exist. They work. But few homes have them. Only 1,400 hold a science-based badge. That’s against 44 million homes at risk. The closest fixes need yearly upkeep from the homeowner. Or power and water that often fail first.
That’s the real gap Pyrskene exists to close. Not “wildfire is bad” — a clear scientific answer that hasn’t reached homes yet. Full details, with sources: our Science page.
What we’re building
Pyrskene builds defense at the point homes catch fire: embers, heat, and direct flame. Not the fire as a whole. It works on homes that stand today, not just new ones. It won’t depend on a homeowner’s memory. Or on power and water that often fail first. We can’t share the mechanism yet. That’s for direct talks, usually under NDA.
Where we are
We’re not raising yet. Right now, we’re in review. We show the design to outside experts first. Real critique, before we scale. Before we ask for funds. This isn’t a delay. It’s how we work: find the flaws early, from people who’d know. Before a customer does. Before a fire does.
Active Conversations
- Fire & structural engineers – They check the design against how homes ignite.
- Materials scientists – They test how well the materials hold up.
- Code officials & regulators – An early check on how this fits fire codes.
- Insurance underwriters – A gut check: would an insurer price this in?
[We’ll name names once they agree to be named.]
What’s next
Once expert feedback shapes the design, next comes a funded proof-of-concept. We’ll build a working version. We’ll test it against the same standards researchers use today. We plan for 18 to 24 months. Three terms are still being set with counsel: Raise size, SAFE or priced round, Use of funds.
We’ll share these with investors in active talks.
Talking with us now
This page is for one kind of talk. Early, not a live raise. Reach out now and you’ll see our expert review as it happens. You’ll get to ask questions before we set terms. You’ll get first access when the real round opens. We’re picky about who we talk to now. The same way we’re picky about our first hires. A few right talks beat a lot of generic ones.
Team
In stealth mode – we’ll discuss more when ready.
A note on this page
Nothing on this page constitutes an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities. It’s a short summary for people we already know.
Want to talk?
Reach out directly — we read every message from investors and reply personally.